MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2386834037

Study on Engineering Culture Technics of Transplanted Cotton After Harvest of Wheat

2000· article· en· W2386834037 on OpenAlexaff
Zhao Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueACTA AGRICULTURAE BOREALL—SINICA · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLintTransplantingSeedingYield (engineering)AgronomyMaturity (psychological)MathematicsHorticultureBiologySowingMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the sourth of shanxi, after harvest of wheat, transplanting cotton can obtain lint cotton 904.5-1266.0 kg/ha, generally obtain 1 050 kg or so, lint cotton yield can be increased by over 375.0 kg/ha, compared with that of direct seeding. The machanism of increasing yield for transplanting is mainly to get accumulated temperature 1 000-1 300 ℃ on seed beds besides in the fields, which could efe out the accumulated temperature and the growth stage of the seeding cotton after harvest of wheat. The engineering culture technics is a set of comprehensive technics i.e. to make plant balls with machine, mechanically transplant, set two plants/hill, use good variety and enhance early maturity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACTA AGRICULTURAE BOREALL—SINICASame topicSoil Mechanics and Vehicle DynamicsFrench-language works237,207