MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2386925495

Synthesis of Hollow Fe_3O_4 Submicrospheres and Their Adsorption-Desorption Capability for Congo Red

2012· article· en· W2386925495 on OpenAlexaff
Zhao Ming

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicNanomaterials for catalytic reactions
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoercivityAdsorptionCongo redMaterials scienceDesorptionChemical engineeringSaturation (graph theory)Crystal (programming language)Magnetic nanoparticlesParticle (ecology)NanotechnologyNanoparticleChemistryOrganic chemistryCondensed matter physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hollow Fe3O4 single crystal particles with excellent magnetic properties can be synthesized by simple solvothermal process.Hollow spherical particles is reunited by particle size of 50 nm,the outsider diameter of which is about 500 nm and the inside diameter is about 200 nm.With the increasing of reaction time,the near Fe3O4 nanometer crystals directed reunited following the crystal face(311).Finally it formed the Hollow spherical particles after Oswald ripening process.The Fe3O4 particles composited by experiment show special magnetic properties which have relatively low saturation magnetization and high coercivity.According to the Congo red solution adsorption-desorption experiments,hollow Fe3O4 particles have higher adsorption and desorption.Using Fe3O4 as Adsorbent in Wastewater treatment process can remove the dissolved organic pollutants more efficiently.At the same time,it can also recollect,improve the waste water purification rate and expand the applications of magnetic materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNanomaterials for catalytic reactionsFrench-language works237,207