Adaptability Evaluation of Introduced Alfalfas in the Arid and Semi-humid Area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alfaking,Pick 3006,Pick 8925 and Spreador-3 were introduced from America and Canada,using Zhonglan No.1 as the regional control After completed district tests in the arid and semi-arid areas in 2002-2004,adaptability evaluation were conducted in the semi-humid area in 2008 and 2009.The result indicated that,five introduced alfalfa could grow normally in the semi-humid area and completed all the procreation periodicity,without exceptional representation and diseases and pests.We analyzed procreation periodicity,nutrition component,growth rapidity and ratio of stem and leaf.It also shown that the highest content of dissociative proline and soluble sugar was Alfaking,the lowest content of malondialdehyde also was Alfaking and the fresh yield of Alfaking was 125 642.8 kg/hm2 in the semi-aridity areas.Spreador-3nd Zhonglan No.1 were the choiceness varieties.The study advised that those five alfalfas can cultivate in the semi-arid and semi-humid areas in Loess plateau.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".