Study on ecological security in Three Gorges reservoir area of Chongqing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through survey of present ecological security situation of the mountainous region in Three Gorges reservoir area of Chongqing, the reasons for threatening ecological security in Three Gorges reservoir area are analyzed. It is pointed out that planting in steep slope, over reclamation and graze, excessive cutting firewood and utilization of land and biological resources, vegetation distruction, unsuitable development mountain areas and construction of factory and town, and untreated emission waste of work and living are main factors to threat ecological security of Three Gorges reservoir area. The backword production model, extensive cultivation and management, unsuitable structure of industry and so on make ecological system further worsen. Finally, the countermeasures and proposes of establishing ecological security system including the accelerating natural protection region construction, putting small basin construction and stereoscopic agriculture construction into practice, and returning the grainplots to forestry are put forward.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it