MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2387107412

Analysis on crushing efficacy of gas flow crushing equipment

2005· article· en· W2387107412 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ying Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueShenyang Gongye Daxue xuebao · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleMistEngineeringInletFlow (mathematics)Mechanical engineeringCondensationPetroleum engineeringMechanicsStructural engineeringMaterials scienceThermodynamicsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The working principle of the fluid bed gas flow crushing equipment is introduced in this paper. The effects of the crushing speed on the crushing efficacy are studied. The result shows that there is a (nonlinear unliner) relation between them. Performance of Laval nozzle and a series of problems resulted from the nozzle. The paper suggested that attentions should be given to dimensions and forms of Laval nozzle and reasonable inlet/outlet pressure ratio. Nozzle should be regularly washed and checked for wearing. (Problems) of wet and aggregated material particles, low production efficiency and equipment malfunctions result from condensation, mist and frost in the pipe system, which temperature is difference inside and (outside) pipe. Improving measures are finally put forward.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShenyang Gongye Daxue xuebaoSame topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207