MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2387154195

Nozzle flows of the missile launching under water

2001· article· en· W2387154195 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Propulsion Technology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleThroatMechanicsMissileOverall pressure ratioDischarge coefficientPhysicsMaterials scienceEngineeringThermodynamicsAerospace engineeringMedicineAnatomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple model was proposed to study the flows in the Laval nozzle under water. Numerical simulations show that there are power law relations for the obstruction mass flows Δ Q and the obstruction interval Δ t with the throat area A t of nozzle: Δ Q ∝ A 1.5 t ,Δ t ∝ A 0.5 t , and with the difference between the stagnant pressure p 0 and the local static pressure: Δ Q andΔ t ∝{[ p 0-( p 1+ ρ w gH )]/ ρ w } -0.76 when only changing the depth H . It is reasonable that the obstruction is stronger when increasing the depth H . Nevertheless, the obstruction can be decreased by decreasing the throat area A t, or increasing ratio of exit to throat areas A b/ A t or increasing stagnant pressure p 0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it