MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2387353498

Study the Effect of pH on Protein Metabolism During Germination of Soybean Seed

2009· article· en· W2387353498 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jianzhong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationProteaseChemistryAmmoniaFood scienceMetabolismProtein degradationAgronomyBiochemistryEnzymeBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the process of soybean seed germination,external environment greatly influences internal protein change of seeds,pH is a very important factor.This study under the condition of different pH during soybean seed germinating,studied the relative water quantity,soluble protein and ammonia nitrogen content,activity of protease and peptidase etc,and physiological and biochemical indexes changes,to explore the effect of pH on protein metabolism.Results showed that water uptake was the fastest at pH 6.0 and pH 8.0,and germination rate was the largest at pH 8.0.Soluble protein content was the highest at pH 6.0,when pH up to 7.5,It's content decreased to the lowest.In addition,the activity of protease and peptidase was the highest when pH 6.0 and 9.0 during experiment,and protein degradation products-peptide and amino acid content was the highest at pH 6.0 and 9.0 respectively.In all,this research supplied a foundation to further study the process of seed germination on one hand,on the other hand,this research provided theory basis for understanding seed germination process at physiological and biochemical levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207