MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2387383588

A Matching Algorithm of Flowing Trend Pattern of Fingerprint Ridges

2007· article· en· W2387383588 on OpenAlexaff
Yuan Hua

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinutiaeRidgeFingerprint (computing)Computer scienceMatching (statistics)Sampling (signal processing)AlgorithmFeature (linguistics)Blossom algorithmStability (learning theory)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionFingerprint recognitionMathematicsGeologyStatisticsPaleontology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ridge curves almost make up the whole feature of a fingerprint. It is the important basis to identify fingerprint according to the global structure and trend of fingerprint curves. In the paper, we import a new eigenvector to depict the ridge curves’ flowing trend, and present a novel algorithm for matching based on it. In our algorithm, we first select and sampling a couple of ridges from feature area, then describe the trend of ridges by sampling points. Based on the sampling points, we extract the eigenvectors and matching by them. This method escapes from the constraints of the traditional algorithm by minutia, and make good use of the stability of flowing trend and relativity between ridges. It has a good precision in matching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207