Preparation of Supported Ni-B Amorphous Alloy Catalyst via New Chemical Reduction System and Its Catalytic Hydrogenation Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The supported catalyst P1 was prepared with hydrazine hydrate and potassium borohydride as(co-reducers) in a mixed solvent consisting of methanol,ethanol and water in a proper proportion.The catalyst was a kind of nanosized amorphous alloy characterized by TEM,XRD and SAED.Catalyst P1 was used to(catalyze) the hydrogenation of o-chloronitrobenzene,and compared with the amorphous catalyst P2 prepared by the common method.As it is shown in the results,the activity and selectivity of P1 are slightly higher than those of P2,and the amount of potassium borohydride consumed in the preparation of P1 was only half of that in the preparation of P2.The effects of hydrazine hydrate,potassium borohydride,pH and solvent on the(properties) of the catalyst were also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".