Comparative Analysis of Morphological,Cytology and Ultrastructural of F_1 Hybrids Crossing by Common Wheat and Triticales Secale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With common wheat jingdong 8 as female parent and Triticales secale jinsong 5 as male parent,the hybrids F1 was obtained.On the basis of morphological and cytological identification of the hybrids F1 generation and parents,we compared the sub-micro-morphology of leaf epidermis and stomata of hybrids F1 and parents by the scanning electron microscope,and find several common features from these three tested materials that they all have stomata,long cells and hair cells,and their cells are arranged in parallel with leaf vein.But to the female parent,Common Wheat jingdong 8,their leaf epidermal cells are all with clear outlines and array neatly and smoothly,their pores of array in a straight line,and the dumbbell-shaped guard cells have bristles of varying lengths;around the stomata of the male parent Triticales secale,ridge-like bulges are horizontally and vertically arrang-ed,the stomata are rectangular,in bigger size and are mainly arranged in straight line,and the guard cells is very obvious while its bristles are short and rare;the sub-micro-morphology of leaf epidermis and stomata of hybrids F1 are quite similar with its male parent.What is different is that the hybrids F1 has bristle on its leaf epidermis bristle,and the size of its pores is between the two parents.The F1 hybrids is quite different with its parents in ultrastructure morphological characteristics of morphology,leaf epidermal and stomata.Ultramicroscopic morphology index can be used to distinct and identify the hybrids and its parents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".