MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2387685904

Anatomic Study on the Seed Development of Amphicarpaea edgeworthii Benth.

2011· article· en· W2387685904 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
She YueHui

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndospermBiologyOvuleZygoteEmbryoPrimordiumIntegumentBotanyEmbryogenesisCell biologyGeneticsGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amphicarpaea edgeworthii Benth.is a wild species of the legume,with important value on the soybean breeding and researchs of plant developmental biology.The seed development of Amphicarpaea edgeworthii Benth.were observed using paraffin sectioning method by microscope.The ovule was fertilized and formed the zygote after flowering about 12 hours.The zygote was transfersely divided into a terminal cell and a basal cell in 2 days after flowering.The proembryo continued cell division in very directions forming globular embryo and then heart-shaped embryo,in which the cotyledons primordium began to occur.In 24 days after flowering,the embryo differentiated into matured embryo through Tropedo-shaped embryo(in 16 days after flowering).The endosperm cell began to form when the globular proembryo was formed,and the development of the endosperm was nuclear type.The mature seed of Amphicarpaea edgeworthii Benth is the seed without endosperm.The outer integument developed into the seed coat,and the seed coat cells were the fence cells with corneum,that might be one of the important reasons of hard seeds for Amphicarpaea edgeworthii Benth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207