MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2387768832

An Approach to Palm-dorsal Vein Recognition Based on Local Gabor Phase Feature

2010· article· en· W2387768832 on OpenAlex
GU Xiao-dong

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiometricsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Gabor filterPreprocessorHistogramFeature (linguistics)Computer visionFeature extractionMatching (statistics)Palm printImage (mathematics)MathematicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new approach to palm-dorsal vein recognition. In contrast to the existing methods, our method employs low-resolution palm-dorsal vein images to achieve effective identification. This method consists of two parts: one part is the palm-dorsal image preprocessing and region of interest (ROI) extraction, the other part is vein feature extraction and verification, using local 2D Gabor phase encoding variance feature to represent the texture feature of the vein image and using histogram to represent the global feature. Chi-square distance is used to evaluate the matching degree. On our own palm-dorsal vein image database, experimental results show that this method achieves 100% acceptance rate and 0% false refuse rate, which indicates the vein pattern biometric is potentially a useful biometric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it