The US' Position on the Doha Round Negotiation on the Agreement of Subsidy and Countervailing Duty Measures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The WTO members took the hard Doha round negotiation on Nov.2001.In the past 8 years,many members including US submit lots of proposals,involving the definition of subsidy,prohibited subsidy,export credit,serious prejudice,material injury,non-actionable subsidy,notification of subsidy,nature resource and some procedural problems in the countervailing measures.The WTO also circulated two chairman text on this issue.As the U.S.always leads the multilateral subsidy and anti subsidy rules,and it is one of the most user of the countervailing duty measures in the world,it' submission indicates the future of the multilateral rule on some extent.This note collects the US' proposals and hopes to do some help on indicating the future of the multilateral subsidy and countervailing subsidy rule.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.023 | 0.022 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".