MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2387954476

Creep behaviors of light-weight EPS treated soil

2010· article· en· W2387954476 on OpenAlex
Jinyuan Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hohai University · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreepExpanded polystyreneConsolidation (business)Materials scienceGeotechnical engineeringConstitutive equationComposite materialPolystyreneStructural engineeringGeologyEngineeringFinite element methodPolymer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of tests on the creep behaviors of light-weight expanded polystyrene (EPS) treated soil were performed with single-step and multi-step loading methods by use of twin high-pressure consolidation apparatus. A compressive creep constitutive model was proposed for the light-weight EPS treated soil based on test results. The test results indicate that the light-weight EPS treated soil exhibits attenuating creep behaviors and has no sharp creep stage. The larger the load,the longer time the creep deformation reaches the steady stage. A comparison between the measured and predicted values from the creep model show that the proposed creep model can reflect the creep behaviors of the new fill material and can be applied in engineering practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it