MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2388069962

The Influence of Varnish and Paper Performance on Watermark Effect

2008· article· en· W2388069962 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Xian-fu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWatermarkVarnishTransmittanceComputer scienceMaterials scienceEngineering drawingEngineeringArtificial intelligenceComposite materialOptoelectronicsEmbedding
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using mechanical means to manufacture watermark paper in paper-making process plays a stronger security role,but is not widely used.In the personalized printing technology field printing watermark has a wide range of applications,using watermark varnish to achieve watermark effect has become a new research hot spots.The watermark effect made by watermark varnish is affected by many other factors such as varnish itself and paper structure.The effect of infiltration volume,color,as well as the type of paper on the watermark effect are discussed by testing the transmittance of the watermark part of paper.It shows that varnish infiltration volume and paper structure affect the results significantly,and the varnish color affects little.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Beijing Institute of Graphic CommunicationSame topicImage Processing and 3D ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207