A Research of the Level of Facilitation of Frontier Trade of Xinjiang, China and the Surrounding Countries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trade facilitation has become one of the popular issues concerned by many countries and international organizations. This paper takes frontier trade of Xinjiang, China as the research focus, builds the evaluation index system of trade facilitation of frontier trade by selecting 14 indexes, and uses the Comprehensive Evaluation Analysis to make an empirical analysis of the level of facilitation of frontier trade of Xinjiang, China. The results show that the level of trade facilitation of frontier trade of Xinjiang, China is the highest, followed by Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Except that its level of trade facilitation of railway port facilities is lower and its number of internet users is smaller than that of Russia, Xinjiang boasts a higher level in terms of the other indexes than that of surrounding countries, but the difference is small and the overall environment of frontier trade needs to be improved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it