MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2388364143 · doi:10.18060/20963

"If You Can't Measure It, You Can't Manage It": Transboundary Waters, Good Governance and Data & Information Sharing & Exchange

2013· article· en· W2388364143 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Kyle Paisley, Taylor W. Henshaw

Bibliographic record

VenueIndiana international & comparative law review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsCentre for International Governance Innovation
FundersGlobal Environment Facility
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Corporate governanceBusinessInformation sharingInformation exchangeEnvironmental economicsComputer scienceEconomicsFinanceData miningWorld Wide WebTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In governing transboundary waters it is critical to establish and maintain exchange agreements and networks for data and information sharing among stakeholder basin states and institutions. This practice maximizes securitization by building trust, which translates to unified and adaptive governance of transboundary waters. Data and information sharing is considered a precondition for data integration, joint modeling, and common monitoring protocols' and is also widely seen as a basis or 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.033
Scholarly communication0.0150.018
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0180.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndiana international & comparative law reviewSame topicInternational Maritime Law IssuesFrench-language works237,207