MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2388520772

Synthesis and luminescent properties of Ca_8MgY(PO_4)_7:Re~(3+)(Re~(3+)=Eu~(3+),Ce~(3+),Tb~(3+)) phosphors

2014· article· en· W2388520772 on OpenAlexaff
Cao Jing-jin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Functional Biomaterials · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphorMaterials scienceDopingUltravioletIrradiationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)LuminescenceNuclear chemistryEmission intensityEmission spectrumSpectral lineChemistryOptoelectronics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

采用固相法成功合成了具有β-Ca3(PO4)2结构的发光材料Ca8MgY(PO4)7∶Re3+(Re3+=Eu3+,Ce3+,Tb3+)。XRD、FT-IR及TG-DSC的测试结果表明,该发光材料的最佳烧结温度为1 200℃。PL测试结果表明,在252nm紫外光激发下,Ca8MgY(PO4)7∶Eu3+呈现Eu3+的特征发射,其中以位于612nm红光发射为主(5D0-7F2),Eu3+的最佳掺杂浓度为5.0%(摩尔分数)。在295nm紫外光激发下,Ce3+激活的Ca8MgY(PO4)7由峰值位于363nm的带状5d1-4f1发射为主,Ce3+的最佳掺杂浓度为1.0%(摩尔分数)。在228nm紫外光激发下,低掺杂浓度的Ca8MgY(PO4)7∶Tb3+以位于5D3-7FJ的蓝光发射为主,高掺杂浓度的Ca8MgY(PO4)7∶Tb3+以5D4-7FJ绿光发射为主,这是由于Tb3+的交叉弛豫造成的。Tb3+的最佳掺杂浓度为7.0%(摩尔分数)。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Functional Biomaterials→Same topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials→French-language works237,207→