Effect of Alloy Elements on Electrochemical Performance of Al-Zn-In-Mg-Ti Sacrificial Anode
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
9 types of Al-Zn-In-Mg-Ti sacrificial anodes with different amounts of Zn,In,Mg,and Ti were designed by the orthogonal method and casted.The electrochemical performance of Al-Zn-In-Mg-Ti sacrificial anodes was tested with constant current method and polarization curves.The results showed that the current efficiency of the anodes increased with titanium content increasing,decreased with the amount of indium increasing,and increased first,then decreased with zinc,magnesium content increasing.The anodes dissolved uniformly without passivity,and there were two different discharging processes during the dissolution.The best recipe of the anode(wt%) was Zn 6.0,In 0.020,Mg 1.5,Ti 0.080,Al Balance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it