MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2388659648

Effect of material price changing on cost percentage typical residential building

2004· article· en· W2388659648 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Li Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pingdingshan Institute of Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicValue Engineering and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)ResidenceUnit costUnit priceTotal costUnit (ring theory)Agricultural economicsEnvironmental scienceOperations managementEconomicsToxicologyMathematicsGeographyDemographic economicsAccountingMicroeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to analyze the composition of the cost of residential construc tion, and the influence resulted from the material price of luctuation, a typical mul tistory residence building of Zhengzhou is chosen as the case. Then its total costs are accounted four times independently a ccording to Henan Building And Decorates Engineering Comprehensive Rate (2002), respectively with material prices published by the government in the second, third, fourth quarter of 2003, and the first quarter of year 2004 as the foundat ion. At last, the formation of the typical residence's cost and the influence on the building's cost from mater ial price change are analyzed. When taken the div isional project as unit to analyze the cost forming, the reinforced concrete cost the most. Take the first quarter of 2004 as an example, it takes up 47.5% (5 per cent over the original rate). The sensibility of total cost to material price depenels on its cost constitution, especially the amout of the material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pingdingshan Institute of TechnologySame topicValue Engineering and ManagementFrench-language works237,207