Analysis of the correlative factors of melanchaolia after acute cerebral infarction and its prevention and cure studies with paroxil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore the correlative factors on melanchaolia after acute cerebral infarction and its prevention and cure studies.Methods 153 patients with acute cerebral infarction were examined by CT immediately after hospitalization. Position, size and the number of the infarcion sites were recorded, and on the 10th day all were assessed respectively by Hamilton depression scale(HAMD) and by Canadian Neurologic-deficiency Scale( CNS). The correlation of melanchaolia and the sites ,size of cerebral infarction and neuraldeficiency scale were analyzed. Psycological intervention and cure with paroxil were used on melanchaolia patients.Results The morbidity of melanchaolia was 37.9% in 153 patients, which was related with position and size of infarction and had a positive correlation with sex and scores on CNS results. The HAMD and CNS results were greatly increased after treatment.Conclusions Melanchaolia incidence in the acute cerebral infarction and convalescence period of cerebral haemorrhagia has positive correlationship with sex ,CNS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".