MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2388900391 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.184504

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>SR</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> and magnetometry study of superconducting 5% Pt-doped <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>IrTe</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>

2016· article· lv· W2388900391 on OpenAlexafffund
M. N. Wilson, T. Medina, Timothy J. S. Munsie, Sky C. Cheung, Benjamin A. Frandsen, L. Liu, Jiaqiang Yan, David Mandrus, Y. J. Uemura, G. M. Luke

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2016
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicIron-based superconductors research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchMcMaster University
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesJapan Atomic Energy AgencyTRIUMFNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster UniversityU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of International Science and EngineeringDivision of Materials ResearchOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSuperconductivityMuon spin spectroscopyCondensed matter physicsMagnetometerPenetration depthSuperfluidityPhysicsLondon penetration depthDopingMagnetic fieldQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present magnetometry and muon spin rotation $(\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{SR})$ measurements of the superconducting dichalcogenide ${\mathrm{Ir}}_{0.95}{\mathrm{Pt}}_{0.05}{\mathrm{Te}}_{2}$. From both sets of measurements, we calculate the penetration depth and thence superfluid density as a function of temperature. The temperature dependence of the superfluid densities from both sets of data indicate fully gapped superconductivity that can be fit to a conventional $s$-wave model and yield fitting parameters consistent with a BCS weak coupling superconductor. We therefore see no evidence for exotic superconductivity in ${\mathrm{Ir}}_{0.95}{\mathrm{Pt}}_{0.05}{\mathrm{Te}}_{2}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicIron-based superconductors researchFrench-language works237,207