MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2388920825

A real-time ship safety early warning method based on trajectory prediction

2014· article· en· W2388920825 on OpenAlexaff
Sang Ling-zh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Navigation and Safety
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrajectoryWarning systemALARMBridge (graph theory)Computer scienceReal-time dataMarine safetyYangtze riverOperations researchReal-time computingEngineeringMarine engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To achieve real time early warning of ship safety,assist the ship officer in estimating the risk timely and avoiding the ship accident,a novel method is developed for predicting ship trajectory. Based on collected real time information,such as AIS information,hydrological and weather information,foundational navigation elements information,ship 's trajectories could be predicted. After computing ship 's dynamic values of DCPA and TCPA,the ship's dynamic space risk and time risk can be calculated to obtain the real-time navigation risk,the real time early warning can be achieved finally. The accident involving Liyuan 2 and the Wuhan Yangtze River Bridge is analyzed as a case study. By using the proposed method,ships in target area could be supervised. When an urgent situation is about to happen,it can be judged automatically,whilst the accident risk can be distinguished in advance,the real-time early warning function can be achieved. The results show that proposed method can make up for shortcomings of existing systems,with detecting the high risk navigation behaviors and giving an alarm timely and effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaritime Navigation and SafetyFrench-language works237,207