MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2389003008

Effects of UV-B Radiation and Drought on Physiology and Antioxidant Enzyme in Transgenic Rice

2011· article· en· W2389003008 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhao FengYun

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAPXOryza sativaAntioxidantShootDrought stressPhotosynthesisGenetically modified riceUltraviolet B radiationBiologyHorticultureChlorophyllGlutathioneProlineBotanyEnzymeChemistryAgronomyTransgeneUltraviolet radiationGenetically modified cropsBiochemistryGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comparative study on changes of physiology and antioxidant enzyme in transgenic rice carrying glutathione-S-transferase(GST,EC.2.5.1.18) and catalase1(CAT 1,EC.1.11.1.6)and non-transgenic rice(Oryza sativa L.Zhonghua No.11) exposed to UV-B radiation stress or combined UV-B radiation and 10% PEG drought stress was conducted.The results showed that when subjected to UV-B radiation and combined UV-B radiation and drought,the shoot length,relative water content,total chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate were higher in the transgenetic rice(T) than that of non-transgenetic rice(N).The content of MDA were lower in T than that of N,and the activity of GST,CAT,SOD,APX in the shoots of T was higher than that of N.The results indicated that the expression of GST and CAT in the transgenic rice resulted in increased tolerance to UV and drought stress.Moreover,under this experiment condition,less damage was observed in the combined UV-B radiation and drought(especially under strong radiation) treated rice than that of single UV-B radiation treated one.It implied that drought stress relieived ultraviolet stress to certain degree,especially in transgenetic rice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicLight effects on plantsFrench-language works237,207