The Effect of the Negative High Electric Field on Germination of Licorice Seeds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article studied the negative high electric field to process the licorice seed,and its influence on the germination.The different negative high electric field(E=3nkV/cm n=0,1,2……9),the different processing time(T=5n min n=2,3,4,5)and the different processing methods of seed(1,processing it for direct electric field;2,after immersing in 98%sulfuric acid then processing it for electric field)to process the licorice seeds,then measures the germination rate.The experimental data by single factor analysis of variance and then LSD multiple comparisons to analyze.This experiment sets comparison groups.The result indicates that processing 1has highest germination rate under the E=27kV/cm,T=10min electric,seeds germination rate is(42.33±1.53)%,and it shows the most significant,Under the E=18kV/cm,T=25min,seeds germination rate of processing 2is highest,It is(83±4.24)%,and difference is the most significant.Overall,The germination rate that after immersing in 98% sulfuric acid then processing licorice seeds is higher than electric field process licorice directly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".