MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2389044155

STUDY ON THE LEACHING INFLUENCE FACTORS OF ALDICARB IN SOIL AND CASE EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER

2003· article· en· W2389044155 on OpenAlexaff
Zhaohui Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nankai University · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAldicarbGroundwaterLeaching (pedology)Environmental scienceGroundwater pollutionSoil waterPollutionEnvironmental chemistryExtraction (chemistry)Soil scienceChemistryPesticideGeologyChromatographyAquiferAgronomyGeotechnical engineeringEcologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we studied the leaching influence factors of aldicarb in soil by soil column experiments. Based on experiments and factor analyzing, groundwater pollution possibility of lulong county by aldicarb was evaluated. At the same time, the aldicarb concentration in groundwater of Lulong county was determined by conbining the solid-phase-extraction and gas chromatography (SPE-GC) to judge the evaluation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nankai UniversitySame topicPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207