Emprovement of Rhodiola rosea on intestinal immune function of Drosophila melanogaster
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To study the effect of Rhodiola rosea extracts on intestinal immune function of Drosophila melanogaster.Methods D.melanogaster was treated by SDS and fungal biological solution with or without R.rosea extracts,and the effect of R.rosea extracts on the survival rate of D.melanogaster,intestinal epithelium cell death,relative contents of reactive oxygen species(ROS) in intestinal epithelium cells,and intestinal morphology changes were analyzed.Results R.rosea extracts could significantly improve the survival rate of SDS and fungus(Beauveria bassiana)-infected D.melanogaster(P 0.05),reduce the intestinal epithelial cell death and the level of intestinal ROS levels,and protect and maintain the intestinal morphology.Conclusion R.rosea extracts could significantly improve the intestinal immune function of D.melanogaster with the amelioration and protection of intestinal immunologic function injury induced by fungi and SDS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it