MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2389113450

Influence of Boiler Capacities on Enrichment Law of Mercury

2008· article· en· W2389113450 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Changsui Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Power Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMercury (programming language)Flue gasBoiler (water heating)CoalCombustionWaste managementFly ashChemistryEnvironmental scienceBottom ashFlueCoal combustion productsElectrostatic precipitatorEnvironmental chemistryEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taking six domestic coal-fired power plants as objects of study,element mercury contained in the flue gas were analyzed with the Ontario-hydro(OH) method recommended by U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA).Meanwhile mercury content in solid samples,taken from inlet coal,bottom ash,fly ash from flue gas and precipitator,were measured by the DMA80 full automatic mercury detector.Based on calculation and analysis with mercury concentration data detected,emission characteristics of mercury in above power plants and enrichment factors I_K of mercury in their solid coal combustion by-products were obtained,whereas the influence of boiler capacities on the emission characteristics analyzed.Results indicate that the speciation and distribution of mercury are influenced by combustion facilities and conditions.With the rise of boiler capacity,mercury in coal tends to be transferred to flue gas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Power EngineeringSame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207