Comparative study on the possible implications of‘warm'or‘cold'hemostatic procedures performed during tonsillectomy in post-operative local pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the possible implications of'warm'or cold'hemostatic procedures performed during tonsillectomy in post-operative local pain based on a clinical trial.Methods One hundred cases to be undergone tonsillectomy were divided into two groups,with 50 in each,and‘warm'or‘cold'hemostatic procedures were performed to stop bleeding occurring in the wound during tonsillectomy for the cases in either group of cases.Then,the volume of bleeding occurred during the operation was recorded,the interval of time length begun to take in food as usual was determined following the surgery,and McGill pain scoring system was taken to evaluate the post-operative pain in a way of questionnaire at the third post-operative day for a comparative analysis between the two groups.Results The averaged volume of bleeding measured during the operation and the interval length of time begun to take in food as usual were l 0.26+0.69 ml and A compare study of evaluation on pain alter tonsillectomy by warm and cold hemostasis 2.52+0.42 d for the cases in the group with‘warm'hemostatic procedures,while they were 12.52+0.45 ml and 2.12+0.63 d for those in the group with‘cold'hemostatic procedures respectively,statistically with significance(P0.05)among them.When the scoring indicators to evaluate the persisting time length of post-operative pain in the wound were compared,three of them were significantly longer in the'warm' hemostasis group than that in‘cold'hemostasis group,with only one shorter in the former than in the latter9(P0.05),but all the other indicators being of no significance statistically9(P0.05).Conclusions The‘warm'hemostatic procedures are safer to operate,with lesser volume of bleeding during the surgery,while with much significant post-operative pain in the local wound than the'cold'one.Therefore.it should be dependent upon the actual local situation of cases undergoing tonsillectomy to choice the most appropriate hemorrhage-stopping procedures for any individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".