MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2389209916

Impact of Surfactants on Asymmetric Bioreduction of 2-Octanone by Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2010· article· en· W2389209916 on OpenAlexaff
Min‐Hua Zong

Bibliographic record

VenueGuocheng gongcheng xuebao · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulmonary surfactantChemistryYield (engineering)Substrate (aquarium)Aqueous solutionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeNuclear chemistryReaction rateChromatographyOrganic chemistryYeastCatalysisBiochemistryMaterials scienceBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In aqueous buffer system containing surfactants of SDS,CTAB and Emulsifier OP-6,the asymmetric reduction of 2-octanone to(S)-2-octanol with Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells was studied.The results indicated that the yield and product e.e.were disappointingly low due to the serious reverse reaction and side reaction in the surfactant-free system.Particularly,at the substrate concentration of 10 mmol/L,they were 77.4% and 78.8% for 96 h reaction.With addition of surfactants to the system,the rates of reverse and side reactions were decreased by Emulsifier OP-6 and CTAB,with the effective increase of the average positive reaction rate.In the systems containing 0.4 mmol/L Emulsifier OP-6 or 0.04 mmol/L CTAB,the yield and e.e.value were 88.4%,91.1% and 97.0%,94.5%,respectively,obviously higher than those in the reaction system without surfactant.The further work showed that the enhancement of efficiency and enantioselectivity of the asymmetric reduction resulted from the effect of the surfactants on the cell characteristics such as growth,membrane penetrability,etc.Among the surfactants investigated,Emulsifier OP-6 performed best.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGuocheng gongcheng xuebaoSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207