MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2389297941

Effect of Actinomycete Act1 on Fusarium Wilt of Replanted Watermelon

2012· article· en· W2389297941 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNorthern Horticulture · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInoculationBiologyBacteriaPopulationHorticultureBotanyAgronomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of bio-control and growth promoting after actinomycete Act1 was inoculated.Plot test in unprotected field were carried out to revel bio-control effects,the dilution-plate culture was used to show the population of microbe in the root domain of watermelon.The results indicated that actinomycete Act1 was inoculated the control efficiency were up to 52.17% and 43.36%.The treatment with actinomycete Act1 significant(P0.05) increased the ratio of the actinomycetes/bacteria,actinomycetes/fungi,bacteria/fungi at root zone,actinomycetes/bacteria and bacteria/fungi in root zone were 1.29~1.75 times and 1.53~5.25 times,atinomycetes/fungi in and roots zone increased 1.38~5.5 times respectively more than control treatment.It was showed that Act1 could ameliorate the micro-ecosystem of the root domain,enhance the disease resistance and improve the biomass of watermelon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it