Case Review Respecting Dumping and Subsidizing of Thermoelectric Containers of China by Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada is the first country collecting Countervailing Duties on goods originating in or exported from China. Canada has initiated 8 investigations respecting the dumping and subsidizing of the goods originating in or exported from China in recent 5 years. The case respecting the dumping and subsidizing of thermoelectric containers originating in or exported from China is a new case and the final determination was made in the end of 2008. According to the final determination, the anti-dumping and countervailing duty must be payable. The CBSA identified 38 subsidy programs in the final determination. The CBSA has determined that the cooperative exporter received subsidies under only 3 programs and the non-cooperative exporters received subsidies under all the 38 programs. In the final determination of this case, the margin of dumping and the amount of subsidy for non-cooperative exporters is much higher than cooperative exporter. This case demonstrated once more that respond positively in trade remedy investigations can make an enterprise receive a better result.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".