MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2389527858

New Advances on the Brightening Efficiency of Optical Brightening Agent (OBA) in HYP-containing Fine Papers

2010· article· en· W2389527858 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChina Pulp & Paper · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLignin and Wood Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrightnessMaterials scienceChemistryOpticsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years,the high yield pulp(HYP)has been found an increasing application in value-added paper grades due to its cost advantages and unique properties.However,the concern still remains on the negative effect of HYP on the optical properties of fine papers.optical brightening agents(OBA)can be used to diminish or offset the negative effects of HYP on the optical properties of fine paper.The brightening efficiency of OBA depends on its efficiency and retention in the paper sheets.In this paper,some parameters influencing the effectiveness and retention of OBA were discussed,such as HYP substitution ratio,HYP brightness,anionic trash and fines in HYP.The new advances on the brightening efficiency of OBA in HYP-containing papers were summarized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it