MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2389713760

Single-wheel Robots With Yaw Ability

2014· article· en· W2389713760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Beijing University of Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)RobotDynamic equationEngineeringComputer scienceControl engineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligencePhysicsChemistryNonlinear system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are some mistakes in the state eqution derived by the dynamic equation by omitting many coupling factors for the sake of simpleness,which is not consistent with the practice,since the system is not controllable. Based on the dynamic equation,and combined with the practice,this paper gives out the modified state equation,making sure that it is controlable. A LQR controller is designed to stabilize the single-wheel robot( SWR) and to make it yaw. To test the robustness of the system,twostep disturbances were applied on the lateral and longitudinal direction,respectively. Both the simulation and the experiment results verify the modified state equation,which lays the fundation for further advanced control algrothim to be performed on the SWR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.139
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it