MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2389724151

PLASTIC CRACK TEST METHOD FOR A NEW FIBER-IMPROVED CEMENT-BASED MATERIAL

2005· article· en· W2389724151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Miao Chang-we

Bibliographic record

VenueJianzhu jishu · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative concrete reinforcement materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCrackingCementComposite materialPolypropyleneMortarFiberTest methodStructural engineeringEngineeringGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sample dimension of the new method for the plastic crack test of cement-based material is 600mm×600mm×70mm, concreted by two layers with the base layer being C60 high strength concrete in which bolts vertical to the bottom are evenly arranged, and the upper layer being used for cement-gelled sand or pure cement mortar test. Laboratory test is made on samples under bad conditions to observe plastic cracking, and analysis is carried out on the plastic cracking situations with different polypropylene fibers and various mixture ratios. The results show that this method is more advanced than that of the Canadian plastic cracking test, and can be used to make quantitative analysis on the function of synthetic fiber in cement-based material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJianzhu jishuSame topicInnovative concrete reinforcement materialsFrench-language works237,207