MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Life history traits interact with landscape composition to influence population dynamics of a terrestrial arthropod: A simulation study

2004· article· en· W2389763250 on OpenAlex
Trine Bilde, Christopher John Topping

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoscience · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiological dispersalEcologyHabitatPopulationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

:Population persistence of animals that have specific habitat requirements in certain life history stages is influenced by spatial and temporal availability of the required habitat. Accessibility of suitable habitats may be affected by their spatial distribution in the landscape and by dispersal ability of the animals. Animals with low dispersal power should be more vulnerable to spatial variation in the distribution of suitable habitats than animals with high dispersal ability. We investigated the effects of differential dispersal power and landscape composition on population dynamics of a terrestrial arthropod by use of a spatially explicit individual-based simulation model. The model was parameterized with data from a common spring breeding carabid beetle in European agroecosystems. Spring-breeding ground beetles depend largely on vegetated field boundaries for (winter) hibernation. We analyzed the effects of and interaction between dispersal rate, field size, and availability of hibernation sites on beetle population development and spatial dynamics. A landscape composed of small fields and a high boundary-to-field size ratio supported larger beetle populations than a landscape consisting of large fields. Animal populations were more robust to variation in spatial distribution of required habitat when dispersal power of individuals was high. In a landscape of large fields, beetles were found to associate with the field boundaries, whereas such an association was not observed in a landscape composed of small fields, suggesting that distance to hibernation sites may be a limiting factor for habitat use. Interactions between life history traits and essential habitat requirements may have profound effects on population dynamics and play an important role in predictions of effects of landscape changes on animal populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it