MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2389799681 · doi:10.32796/cice.2015.89.6099

Impacto de los proyectos de I+D+i empresarial: expectativas y resultados

2015· article· es· W2389799681 on OpenAlexaff
Ascensión Barajas, Elena Huergo

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos Económicos de ICE · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicInnovation Policy and R&D
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

se analizan las diferencias sobre los resultados comerciales esperados y efectivos de los proyectos de i+D+i de empresas perceptoras de ayudas pblicas. Para ello se calculan indicadores cualitativos y cuantitativos de incumplimiento de expectativas y se relacionan con caractersticas individuales de empresas. entre las causas del incumplimiento de las expectativas se encuentran la incertidumbre inherente al proyecto (pertenencia a sectores de alta tecnologa y la alta intensidad innovadora de

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos Económicos de ICESame topicInnovation Policy and R&DFrench-language works237,207