MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2389947522

The Application of Robust H_∞ filtering in the Stochastic Wind Power Generation Systems

2010· article· en· W2389947522 on OpenAlex
Cheng Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJisuanji fangzhen · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsNalcor Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Schur complementRobustness (evolution)MathematicsLyapunov functionLinear matrix inequalityLemma (botany)Filter (signal processing)Wind powerComputer scienceMathematical optimizationEngineeringNonlinear systemEigenvalues and eigenvectors
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the design of robust H∞ filter for stochastic wind power generation systems.Its purpose is to reduce the impact of disturbance on system error and to enhance the robustness of a system.the sufficient conditions of the existence of H∞ filter are deduced with Lyapunov stability theory and expressed in the form of the linear matrix inequality(LMI).Then them are transformed into LMIs which can be solved by utilizing Schur complement lemma.At last standard digital software is utilized to get filter parameters.It is concluded that disturbance attenuation level is γ=0.1150 through the simulation of system.The result demonstrates that the methods of design filter for stochastic wind power generation systems is feasibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it