MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2390244954

Construction and Development of Emergency Refuge System in Underground Mine

2010· article· en· W2390244954 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daming Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueCoal science and technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSafety and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoal miningAutomatic summarizationChinaMining engineeringEngineeringMine safetyCivil engineeringEmergency managementEmergency responseForensic engineeringEnvironmental planningConstruction engineeringCoalGeographyWaste managementComputer scienceMedical emergencyArchaeologyPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the construction requirements of the emergency refuge system of the mine safety refugesix major systemin China underground coal mines,based on study and references on the successful construction and application experiences of the underground mine emergency refuge system in USA,South Africa,Canada and other overseas countries,the paper had a systematic analysis on the features as well as the research and development of the function position,composition and basic mode,and mobile escape cabin for the underground mine emergency system.Meanwhile the paper had a detail analysis and summarization on the related issues to be noted in the underground mine emergency refuge system to be constructed in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCoal science and technologySame topicSafety and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207