MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2390342895

A RESEARCH ON N_2O EMISSION OF PETROLEUM COKE COMBUSTION BLENDING WITH COAL IN CFB

2004· article· en· W2390342895 on OpenAlex
Wenxuan Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Csee · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum cokeCoalFlue gasCombustionCokeFraction (chemistry)PetroleumWaste managementChemistryOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Systematic combustion experiments of mixed fuels with different ratios of petroleum coke over coal are conducted on a 0.5MW_t pilot-scale CFB facility. The effects of various parameters, in terms of the ratio of petroleum coke over coal, the excess air coefficient, the bed temperature, the primary air fraction, the Ca/S ratio on the N_2O emission in the flue gas are revealed in this paper. It indicates from the experiments that with increasing in the ratio of petroleum coke over coal, N_2O emission concentration rises. For puree petroleum coke as fuel, N_2O emission concentration is the lowest than other mixed fuels. It is shown from experimental results that for all fuel mixtures with the primary air fraction, the excess air coefficient and the Ca/S ratio increasing, N_2O concentration rises. When the bed temperature increases, the N_2O concentration drops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it