Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrophoretic banding patterns of gliadin in common wheat cultivars and advanced lines derived from Chinese were determined by acid-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. For the 148 leading commercial cultivars and promising advanced lines used in our study,48 different patterns were identified,29 corresponding to the ω -gliadin ,9 to the γ-gliadin ,5 to the β-gliadin and 5 to the α -gliadin. The most frequent patterns were A6 inω ;B in γ;B in β and A in the region of α . The 148 samples had 114 band types. The gliadin patterns of Chinese wheat cultivars and lines greatly differed from the patterns of wheat lines from other countries. Several patters A3 ,C,H,M and X in ω -zone had not been reported before in the world. In addition,the frequencies of 1BL. 1RS translation are very high(41.2% ) ,this may be a reason for poor-quality of most Chinese wheat cultivars. This information can be used in breeding programs to maintain genetic diversity with Chinese wheat germplasm. Figl ,Tab 3 ,Ref 24.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".