MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2390448317

Management of Hospital Trash in Xi'an

2005· article· en· W2390448317 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Liyan Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueZhiye yu jiankang · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Test (biology)Significant differenceMedicineOperations managementMedical emergencyEnvironmental healthEngineeringGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Objective] To learn the management status of hospital trash disposal and provide basis for improving management level. [Methods] A special questionnaire was designed according to relative national regulations. 17 hospitals were randomly selected and investigated in the 3rd quarter of 2004. Data collected from the investigation was handled and analyzed. [Results] Significant difference was found among hospitals of different levels in the management level (χ~2=43.1204, P0.01). The average item scores of institution, direction, primary handling, system, preventive protection and test were 10 scores, 9 scores, 6.7 scores, below 6 scores, 4.7 scores and below 4 scores. [Conclusion] Staff training and law execution should be strengthened in order to standardize the management of hospital trash disposal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhiye yu jiankangSame topicHealthcare and Environmental Waste ManagementFrench-language works237,207