MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2390488520

Study on extraction process of raspberry polysaccharide with compound enzyme method

2014· article· en· W2390488520 on OpenAlexaff
YU Zeyua

Bibliographic record

VenueDongbei Nongye Daxue xuebao · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPolysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPectinasePapainCellulasePolysaccharideExtraction (chemistry)ChromatographyChemistryResponse surface methodologyEnzymeBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single enzyme(pectinase,cellulase,papain) method was used for extracting polysaccharide,determined by pectinase,cellulase and papain compound to extract the raspberry fruit polysaccharide,the content of polysaccharide was measured by phenol-sulfuric acid method.Based on the ratio of compound enzyme test,the mathematical regression model was established about the dependent variable(extraction yield of polysaccharide) and independent variables(dosage of compound enzymes,pH,temperature and extraction time),and the optimum extraction condition was obtained by response surface methodology(RSM) as followed,composite enzyme mixture(pectinase,cellulase,papain)=2.5??1.7??2.1,the dosage of compound enzyme was 2.6%,pH 4,temperature 55 ℃,extraction time 2.6,the actual value was 4.12%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDongbei Nongye Daxue xuebaoSame topicPolysaccharides and Plant Cell WallsFrench-language works237,207