MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2390506851

Pathogenicity of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus Isolates to Pinus thunbergii and P. massoniana and Incubation of the Nematode

2001· article· en· W2390506851 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luo Hong-wei

Bibliographic record

VenueShenyang Nongye Daxue xuebao · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBursaphelenchus xylophilusPinus thunbergiiPinus massonianaBiologyNematodePathogenicitySeedlingPine woodInoculationPopulationBotanyXylophilusHorticultureVeterinary medicineEcologyMicrobiologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to determine the pathogenicity of Bursapelenchus xylophilus isolates from China, Japan and Canada to 4-year black pine (Pinus thunbergii) and masson pine (Pinus massoniana) seedling. The results showed that their pathogenicity diferentiated distinctly. The mortality of black pine ranged from 0 to 87.5%, and the RHS index ranged from 0 to 110. The pathogenicity of Chinese nematode populations was greater than that of Japan and Canada. The pathogenicity of BxCN3, BxCSC and BxCZD was stronger, with mortality 87.5% and the RHS index exceeding 90. In the 6 isolates whose dead rates were 87.5%, the population of BxCN3 from Nanjing had the shortest death time, 38 days. In all of the tested populatios, the dead process of population BxCZD from Zhejiang was shortest, 14 days in black pine. The results of detrermination in P. massoniana indicated that 4-year seedlings resisted P. xylophilus, with only two seedlings died in this experiment. In this study, incubating carrier with non-symptom was found in P. thunbergii seedlings inoculated with pine wood nematode. It is important for incubaton of nematodes of the spread of the nematode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShenyang Nongye Daxue xuebaoSame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207