MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2390515989

A water supply function in form of Weibull distribution

2003· article· en· W2390515989 on OpenAlexaff
Zhang She-qi

Bibliographic record

VenueXibei zhiwu xuebao · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Resources and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeibull distributionKurtosisWater supplyRange (aeronautics)Function (biology)SkewMathematicsShape parameterStatisticsEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEnvironmental engineeringEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the relationships among water potential productivity, water potential use efficiency and water supply condition, this presentation represents a new water supply function in the form of Weibull distribution. The function is of such sophisticated characteristics that can be used to model the relationship between crop-water supply modified function and water supplement and is wildly used in relevant studies. The function as well as its parameters are described and analyzed in detail. The position parameter, x_0, represents the threshold of water supplement and the scale parameter, A, is depend upon the range of the value of water supplement. Moreover, the shape parameter, B, is also known as the slope, which determines the kurtosis and the skew of the curve described by the function. Different values of the parameters can have marked effects on the behavior of the distribution. It is suggest that one can obtain all parameters by using maximum likelihood method or by empirical study. These parameters are of obvious physical and biological meanings and hence, of better effect in practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueXibei zhiwu xuebaoSame topicWater Resources and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207