MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2390695563 · doi:10.5539/mas.v10n6p1

Analyzing and Investigating the Effect of Nailing on Stabilization Soil Trenches of Sand with Medium Density via Analytical Limit

2016· article· en· W2390695563 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Y. Vafa Shalmani, A. Cheshomi

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil nailingLimit (mathematics)Variable (mathematics)Stability (learning theory)Nail (fastener)Soil stabilizationGeotechnical engineeringEnvironmental scienceMathematicsGeologyComputer scienceSoil scienceSoil waterStructural engineeringEngineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pit stability in urban areas is one of the great problems of enforcement operations. A variety of methods have been devised to fixate and stabilize slopes and pits that Nailing is an example of them that is used in urban areas. In this study, stability of pit has been analyzed using this method and using the S-Nail software that the analysis has been done with limit equilibrium method. In order to investigate the effect of stabilization Nail element in sandy soil with medium density, in both dry and moist conditions, a number of used variables related to soil strength parameters such as C and φ and a number used variable of related element such as the length of the Nail, are horizontal distance of elements from each other, grid or density were considered. So the effect of each variable in the soil stabilization has been obtained and resulting in proposing optimal scheme of the considered soil stabilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationFrench-language works237,207