MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2390862005

Abstract Syntax Notation One and Its Application in TD-SCDMA

2008· article· en· W2390862005 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTD-SCDMAEncoding (memory)Transmission (telecommunications)NotationCoding (social sciences)Interface (matter)Computer networkTelecommunicationsCode division multiple accessArtificial intelligenceOperating systemArithmetic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the TD-SCDMA system,the RRC information is used in the ASN.1 encoding format to increase the transmission efficiency of PER RRC message in the air interface,and in the TD-SCDMA network side of the Iur,Iu and Iub interface are ASN.1 encoding format is used in the Iur,Iub and Iu interfaces of YD-SCDMA network side for transmission.This paper tells of the basic knowledge and ASN.1 BER and PER coding rules,including how to combine TD-SCDMA analytical methods and concretely explain the application of ASN.1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it