MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2391029559

Analysis of Germination Characteristics and Resistance Ability of Abelmoschus manihot Seeds During Its Germination Period

2014· article· en· W2391029559 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sun Lin-hu

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationAbelmoschusHorticultureBiologyManihotDormancyStress (linguistics)AgronomyOsmotic shockBotany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abelmoschus manihot( L.) Medic is an annual wild herbaceous plant which belongs to Abelmoschus Medus,Malvaceae. The seeds are grayish wide renal globes with the length of( 0. 435 ± 0. 039) cm,width of( 0. 414 ± 0. 035) cm and thousand grain weight of( 20. 521 ± 0. 03) g. The seeds need 7 h to imbibe fully in25 ℃ water. The just collected seeds can germinate directly,meaning the seeds have no deep dormancy. The seeds germinate well only under 30 ℃ and alternating light and dark,suggesting high temperature and light are the essential conditions for the seed germination. The seeds show the highest germination rate only under the conditions without salt and osmotic stress,and their germination indices decrease gradually with the increase of Na Cl and PEG stress. These suggest that the germination of A. manihot seeds is highly sensitive to salt stress and osmotic stress. The highest germination rate in this paper is only 58%,suggesting the germination rate of A. manihot seeds is not high. So,in practice the seeds are suggested to germinate first to improve their germination rate under the condition with appropriate temperature,light and non-stress; then the seedlings can be hardened under stress to improve their resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicBotanical Research and ChemistryFrench-language works237,207