MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2391133490

THE STATUS AND MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF GEOLOGIC ENVIRONMENT IN HENAN

2001· article· en· W2391133490 on OpenAlexaff
Zhu Zhong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeomechanics and Mining Engineering
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologic hazardsLoessGeologySubsidenceLandslideNatural (archaeology)Mining engineeringPollutionGroundwaterWater resourcesGeochemistryEnvironmental scienceEarth scienceHydrology (agriculture)Geotechnical engineeringGeomorphology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Henan Province,the natural geologic conditions are complex with weak ecologic environment where there exists not only some unfavourable special geologic environmental conditions and serious geologic hazards,but also not less environmental geological problems caused by human activities. The main unfavourable geologic conditions are certain special unfavourable rock soil mass (collapsing loess and swelling soil),primary geochemical anomaly (water of high fluorine content,water of low iodine content,saline water) and secondary geochemical anomaly (soil sali nization). The main geologic hazards include devolution,land sliding,debris flow,soil erosion,surface subsidence,water gushing in mines,gas esplosion,etc. The main environmental geological problems are as follows:exhaustion of water resources,water pollution,heaping of solid wastes and so on. All the above factors,combining together,have become the obstacle not to be ignored which restricts improving the living standards of the people and development of social economy in Henan Province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeomechanics and Mining EngineeringFrench-language works237,207