Study on the Change of Seeds Vigor and Nutrition of Two Kinds of Herbages in Different Storage Years
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thesis studied on the seed vigor and nutritive composition of Onobrychis viciifolia scop.cv.Mengnong and Bromus ciliatus L.in different storage years.The results showed that the germination rate of Onobrychis vicifolia scop.cv.Mengnong was changed from 18.5% to 86.0% during 10 storage years,Crude protein contents(23.78%-28.06%),Crude fat(2.00%-2.42%),Crude fiber(18.06%-19.64%),Crude ash(4.82%-8.41%),and N-free extract contents(46.02%-47.67%) had decreased on the whole among these years.The germination rate of Bromus ciliatus L.was changed from 4.25% to 68.50% during 11 storage years,Crude protein(12.65%-14.05%),Crude fat(1.60%-1.92%) and N-free extract contents(64.84%-65.92%) were not objective regulation among these years.The variation of Crude fiber(13.79%-15.18%) and Crude ash(4.65%-5.09%) had no significant change(p0.05).In the present experiment preserved condition,Onobrychis viciifolia scop.cv.Mengnong could keep the seed planting value from 7 to 8 years,and Bromus ciliatus L.could be kept from 6 to 7 years.Moreover,two kinds of seeds still had high nutritional value when they lost planting value(germination rate down to 50%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".